/ Faith & Culture / Robin Hood (The Death of a King) – Movie Review

Robin Hood (The Death of a King) – Movie Review

Stacey Tuttle on May 18, 2010 - 8:05 am in Faith & Culture, Movie Reviews, Movies

Robin Hood – The Death of a King

Movie Review by Stacey Tuttle

 I took a class in college that studied Frankenstein – but not just the original Frankenstein.  We read, I think, every version of the Frankenstein story known to mankind. I thought it would be boring to read the same story over and over again, but it was actually fascinating to look at the changes, some subtle, some substantial, in each version and how those changes affected the message and implications of the story.  So, when the new Robin Hood came out, I approached it in much the same way as our class had approached Frankenstein.  What changes are they going to make to the story, and what will those changes mean to the overall message of the story? 

While there were several changes, the one which struck me as the most significant was the way King Richard, Richard the Lionheart, was rewritten.  In the original versions, Robin Hood becomes a hero, protecting and defending Richard’s people while Richard is off to war (on a crusade, if memory serves correct).   Richard the Lionheart is a good, respected king, whose return is much celebrated by all, including Robin Hood.   The movie version however starts with Richard and his army returning from the Crusades, and basically pillaging as they return.  Robin Hood is in this army and though he does his job as a soldier, he has no respect for Richard or the things Richard has asked them to do.  Richard’s character is dubious at best—a man whose character, name and temperament seem to have been tainted and corrupted through time.  Richard dies in battle before returning home, leaving his even more tyrannical and uncharactered brother, Prince John as King.  And, of course, John and Robin soon end up at odds, as the people are far more inclined to honor and follow Robin—a man of courage, natural leadership and character.

So, the more important question isn’t what changed in the story, but what do those changes mean to the significance of the story?  Here is what keeps nagging at me.  It’s the death of the king.  Not just the death of him physically, but also the death of the ideal.  Richard wasn’t just King Richard.  He was known as Richard the Lionheart.  In all former versions, though he is only seen in the last seen of the movie, he is a silent driving force throughout the entire story.  He is the noble king, the good king, the fair king.  He is the king which will set things right when he returns.  Things may be bad for a moment while the King is away and false leaders rise up and take advantage of the people.  But, there is hope in the midst of tyranny because King Richard the Lionheart will return, and when he returns he will bring justice and peace.  Even Robin Hood himself looks eagerly to King Richard’s return and is motivated to act not only on behalf of the suffering people themselves, but to act on Richard’s behalf—to protect the good King’s subjects and the interests of his kingdom. 

The original story of Robin Hood and King Richard bears echoes of the Christian story.  We too have a good King, a noble King, a fair King who will return and set right the things gone wrong in his land.  We too have a King whose very name, presence and returning gives us hope in the midst of suffering.  We too have a man, Jesus, who was willing to suffer, fight and even die, in part to help give people the courage and the power and the knowledge to fight against the enemy until our King’s return. 

In this latest version of Robin Hood, not only is the king’s reputation sullied and his person killed, but the common man is elevated and lifted up.  Our hero is a common man, of no noble birth, whose strength comes from within himself and whose loyalty is to himself.  Granted, he does things for the good of his fellow man, still he has no higher allegiance than himself—he answers only to himself.  The original Robin Hood, while acting outside the false law set up by a false king, was always loyal to the true king.  He was never completely autonomous.  He always had a higher allegiance to the king.  This go ‘round, allegiance and submission to authority is as dead as the concept of any authority worthy of submission. 

I will not go so far as to try to make assumptions about the writers’ and producers’ actual intent.  I am not sure whether they are trying to make a statement about what they think about authority or submission to it, or whether they and this film are simply unwitting products of our culture.  Either way, and regardless of intent, I think these changes to the iconic Robin Hood suggest a significant change in our culture towards authority.  The new message seems to suggest that there is no worthy authority.  Good men must fight for their very lives against all that is unfair.  They may be happy living outside the law, but in truth, there is little hope for reprieve as there is no good king to come and set things right.  That certainly wasn’t the original Robin Hood message.  The original message was that there is a good, lion-hearted king who is worth our allegiance and our service and whose return will set things right.  And it is in the hope of his returning and for the merit of his name that we work to fight against the wrongs and injustices being done in His Kingdom.

Questions for Discussion:

  • What are the changes you see in the 2010 version of Robin Hood from previous versions?
  • What significance do those changes make to the meaning of the film?  Why do you think the writers/producers/directors decided to make the various changes to a story that has been beloved for generations? (It’s not as if the story needed improvement—as if it wasn’t already popular in its original version…and the changes weren’t just cosmetic, technological modernizations.)
  • In Clash of the Titans it’s the gods.  In Robin Hood it’s the kings.  In both cases the supreme authority figures are foolish and tyrannical and the common man is the more noble, honorable character.  Do you think this is representative of your feelings about God and/or of society’s feelings about God? 
  • In Clash of the Titans and in Robin Hood man decides to live for himself and to no longer live for his god or his king.  Would you say this is representative of your response to God and/or of society’s response to God? 
  • Do you feel that there would be more hope and encouragement in your life (or in the world) if you (or others) had confidence that there was a good, kind, noble King/God who would return to set things right?
12 POST COMMENT

Leave a Reply

12 Comments
  • May 27, 2010

    Have you ever considered adding more videos to your blog posts to keep the readers more entertained? I mean I just read through the entire article of yours and it was quite good but since I’m more of a visual learner,I think that to be more helpful well let me know how it turns out! Videos are where the internet is going!:)

    Jody Fiorelli the Wedding Photography Guy
    Reply
  • May 27, 2010

    Interesting…and I agree in the most part. Keep up the excellent work…I will definitely be back shortly

    Ashley Okoren
    Reply
  • June 5, 2010

    Is it not good to reproduce a movie just so you can update its special effects? Hollywood doesn’t look to think so. The classic claymation and stop motion results of old are some of the initial things we think about when bringing up the titles of mythology movies. But one still cannot help but think how totally amazing it would look if it were updated.

    Irvin Schermerhorn
    Reply
  • June 10, 2010

    nice share, good article, very usefull for me…thank you

    stop drinking coffee
    Reply
  • July 9, 2010

    This is an great article, I’ll definitely be sure to add your blog to my list!

    Reply
  • July 10, 2010

    I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it smile I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.

    Reply
  • July 17, 2010

    I had fun reading this article. I need to read more on this topic.. Thanks for sharing this great article.. Anyway, I am gonna subscribe to your rss feed and I hope you post again soon.

    Reply
  • July 17, 2010

    I’ll stick a link to this blog on my website. I’m certain my visitors will think of this article really useful.

    Reply
  • July 18, 2010

    Interesting post, but the sidebar don’t display properly on my Mac…perhaps you ought to take a look. Thanks, anyway.

    Lyndsey Gobeyn
    Reply
  • July 20, 2010

    Thank you for creating valuable info about the subject. I’m an admirer of your writing. Keep up the good work.

    portable folding bar stool
    Reply
  • July 22, 2010

    This is an extremely excellent site you have going here. The matter is very informative and straight to the point. Excited to read more about your blog next time.

    Full Video Converter
    Reply
  • July 22, 2010

    This is an extremely great site you have going here. The matter is very informative and straight to the point. Excited to read more about your blog next time.

    Full Video Converter
    Reply